Tenure and Rank Advancement

I am humbled and very grateful to announce that Hillsdale College granted me tenure at the end of the 2024 spring semester. This was a very long time coming. I used to tell people that, for reasons outside of my control, I was probably the longest untenured tenure-track Assistant Professor in academia. The time I spent at BVU is documented below. While the overall experience was very valuable and allowed me to become friends with some folks I hold very near and dear to my heart, its abrupt and unexpected end was nothing short of traumatic. I was so close to receiving tenure at BVU and getting effectively laid off the year before I should have advanced left me wondering if I would every achieve it.

Hillsdale has been so kind and welcoming to me. I was allowed to apply three years of my prior teaching experience to my tenure clock here, which allowed me to advance after 2.5 years. There were no guarantees that I would receive tenure, but the administration and my colleagues had enough faith in me and my potential that I felt that I should persevere and go for it. And I’m so glad I did. It is an incredible relief to say, after nine years on the tenure-track, that I’m a tenured Associate Professor. Thank you, Hillsdale College, for believing in me and investing in my future.

First year at Hillsdale College

After co-publishing an article, re-prepping three grammar-based seminars, creating a class on medieval/Golden Age Spanish literature, teaching an Honor’s seminar on Boccaccio’s Decameron, directing the tutors in our Spanish program, helping to redesign our major curriculum, and delivering not one, but two puppet shows, I’ve somehow managed to successfully complete my first semester as an Assistant Professor of Spanish at Hillsdale College. And I can’t complain. By and large, the students in my classes have been a joy to work with—they complete their assignments, ask meaningful questions, and aspire to learn about the world, yes, even the Spanish-speaking parts of it, with new appreciation.

For example, I require the students in my 100-level seminars to attend one of several cultural events hosted by the Spanish department each semester. While this may be an anomaly, in the 2021/2022 academic year, my department has managed to organize two film series (with four films each), two salsa dance nights, a Day of the Dead celebration, initiation for Sigma Delta Pi, and the aforementioned puppet shows. With so much to do, this has been an exhilarating year to be a Spanish student at Hillsdale College. Thankfully, my students have responded with enthusiasm to the cultural activities and asked me to add an additional assignment this spring to attend another actividad de enriquecimiento cultural. I mean… who does that?!

In the fall semester, I taught two sections of SPN 101 and one section of SPN 413 (Medieval/GA Spanish Literature). Although I have taught some version of 101 many times before, it is always challenging to use a new edition of a textbook and adapt to a new program. As for SPN 413, I taught some of the texts we used in the course in other classes (my Spanish literature survey, my Santos y bandidos seminar, and my class on the Spanish comedia), but never with a specific focus on the medieval period/Golden Age. In a lot of ways, it was refreshing for me to return to one of my original passions—the Spanish Golden Age—and share some of its most essential texts with the class.

During the spring semester, I taught four classes: two sections of SPN 102, one section of SPN 493 (“Golden Age Theater”) and an honor’s seminar on Giovanni Boccaccio’s Decameron. I applied for the honor’s course on a whim and was pleasantly surprised that they offered it to me. Why teach the Decameron, a clearly medieval Italian text, as a Spanish professor? Another honor’s seminar I taught previously dealt with “Disease and Metaphor.” Since the launching point of the Decameron is the black plague, I really felt like I should have included it in our class readings. But the text, as you probably already know, is a behemoth (800+ pages!). The class ended up being dedicated exclusively to the Decameron and allowed us to take a very close reading of the motley collection of short stories (and characters) that occupy its pages. I was pleasantly surprised at how little of the book had to do with the actual plague (beyond a carefully detailed description in the introduction) and more with storytelling itself.

SPN 102 was a continuation of the material in SPN 101 and I found myself teaching many of the same students. My students must keep a weekly journal in the SPN 100 series. While their entries can be in English in 101, I require them to write exclusively in Spanish in 102. It is a joy for me to look over the progress the students have made as writers in and speakers of Spanish. I always encourage them at the end of the semester to look over their journal entries and realize how far they’ve come with the language.

SPN 493 is the Spanish department’s senior seminar and allows faculty to explore topics and authors that they are especially passionate about. Given my inclination towards theater, it made sense for me to redesign my class on the Spanish comedia. Here are all the plays we read:

  1. El lindo don Diego

  2. El caballero de Olmedo

  3. La vida es sueño

  4. Valor, agravio y mujer

  5. El burlador de Sevilla

  6. La traición en la amistad

  7. El castigo sin venganza

We also consulted some entremeses based on Juan Rana, which helped us when we performed Dragoncillo’s shadow puppet adaptation of Johnny Frog. Here’s a backstage photo from the performance:

All-in-all, I feel like spring 2022 was a success. It was inspiring to work with so many dedicated students that genuinely care and strive to succeed. I’m looking forward to next year.

Something I should mention about Hillsdale: the faculty is appreciated here. This is a unique experience for me. The administration, the students, and the community all admire and are proud of the faculty. This positive attitude has generated a sense of well-being, contentment, and stability for me (something I really appreciate) and grants the professors the intellectual space we need to explore topics, themes, and stories that we feel are fundamentally important for a sound education in the liberal arts. I wouldn’t have dared to read the entire Decameron anywhere else—the text’s size alone is daunting, not to mention its controversial content. But Hillsdale College has faith in its faculty and trusts that we (a) know what should be taught and (b) are capable of conveying, explaining, and, yes, teaching these deep, important ideas to our students. As a professor, it means the world to know that my administration endorses and supports my academic projects and intellectual passions.

This summer will be a bit of an adventure for me. I, alongside Dr. Mack, will be traveling to Costa Rica with a small group of intrepid students to practice Spanish and enjoy the experience of being in Costa Rica—visit a volcano, zip line over the cloud forest, visit the beach, try new foods, see the flora and fauna. I’m excited and admittedly a little nervous since I’ve never been to Costa Rica before. Puerto Rico, sure, but not Costa Rica. I’m sure it will be a great experience.

A New Chapter

Last year was one of the most difficult years I have ever had as an academic. Despite all the global troubles—political turmoil in the US, a worldwide pandemic, and depressed enrollment at institutions of higher ed—, I had some serious personal dilemmas that exacerbated an already worrisome experience.

With the transition to online learning (a modality ill-equipped for language instruction), I found myself begrudgingly creating (and frequently re-creating) PowerPoint presentations to accompany my synchronic lectures. In many ways, I felt like I was reinventing the wheel for several courses that I had already taught into a medium that I would never teach in again. Let’s face it: PowerPoint presentations are tediously time-consuming. All the information has to get front loaded and deliberately organized in such a way that its complexity scaffolds—moving from introductory principles to lower-level activities and then progressing into some higher-level exercises. In short, these are things that I intuitively do in the face-to-face classroom. When I have to spell it out in such a methodically organized way on a PowerPoint, I find the preparation immensely taxing and the execution too inflexible. As a whole, online teaching is a very frustrating ordeal. Can I do it? Yes. Do I wish to do it again? No, I would prefer not to.

2020 was supposed to be a celebratory year for me. After six years at Buena Vista University, I had made sufficient progress towards receiving tenure: my teaching portfolio was robust and student feedback was promising; the service I performed at both the university and community levels was substantial; and I had received virtual guarantees from many of my colleagues that all these contributions—from teaching to service to advising—amounted to an airtight case for tenure. Imagine my surprise when in March, after six strong years of full commitment to this institution, I was summoned to visit with the provost who, reading from a prepared document, informed me that due to financial hardships incurred over the last half decade, the university would be eliminating my teaching line. I would be granted an additional, terminal year as an assistant professor, but there would only be one full-time Spanish faculty member at the university in fall 2021.

Everything reached a fever pitch the following academic year (2020-2021) as I tried to balance a frantic and desperate job search with my regular teaching duties during the middle of a pandemic when all my instruction was shifted to an online format. After many applications, scant interviews, and one campus invitation, I miraculously received a job offer at Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, MI, in February. I cannot tell you how grateful I am to be offered a job at this time. Higher ed has acutely felt the economic pinch of the pandemic. Many institutions, like BVU, have opted to severely restructure themselves by lopping off faculty from ‘under-performing’ majors (I do not like this term—I feel that it takes a very cold, stoic approach to evaluation that overemphasizes classroom enrollment numbers and popularity rather than intrinsic value). What’s more: entire majors have been eliminated, such as BVU’s theater program. I am alarmed by what is going on at colleges and universities across the United States and am especially concerned for liberal arts programs, which do not frequently enjoy the same popularity as STEM majors. It is not difficult to imagine a scenario where former small liberal arts colleges revert to trade and/or pre-professional schools, eliminating language and arts programs altogether. Unlikely, but not infeasible.

In short, I am glad to find myself in the fortunate position of teaching at Hillsdale in the fall. I will be joining an already robust department of 5 (!) faculty members, all with unique disciplinary focii. The institution itself epitomizes what a liberal arts education should be—an opportunity for growth and exploration as students study diverse topics with qualified professors. This is a place that values all modes of scientific and artistic inquiry; it strives to orient students in their discovery of “the good, the true, and the beautiful.” I’m excited to open this new chapter in my academic journey.

Banner year

It has been a while since I’ve last updated my blog. The 2018-2019 academic year has been a bit of a whirlwind for me. I prepped an entirely new community-based class (SPAN 308 “Spanish in the Community”); I planned, prepared, and executed a 3-week study abroad trip to Barcelona; I was invited to give a standalone presentation at Brigham Young University in March; I’ve coordinated with my colleagues in Dragoncillo to visit local elementary and middle schools in El Paso, Texas and share some insights into Spain’s Golden Age, including two shadow-puppet performances of two entremeses; I’ve held down the departmental fort as the sole Spanish professor during the spring semester (my colleague took a much deserved sabbatical); and I’ve generously been nominated as a finalist for four different awards at Buena Vista University.

First, I was delighted to hear that the BVU community selected me as a finalist to receive the George W. Wythe award. As the university’s highest honor for teaching, this prize is unique—a $30,000 cash stipend and a semester-long sabbatical for professional development or research. I am excited to find myself among four equally qualified and esteemed colleagues for this prestigious award.

Second, I was informed by the student body president that the undergraduates at BVU have selected me as a finalist to win the faculty member of the year award. Since this is a student-led effort, I am especially grateful to know that the students I teach hold such a high opinion of my professorial efforts inside and outside the classroom.

Third, BVU’s Center for Diversity and Inclusion kindly shared with me that I am a finalist for the Faculty & Staff Diversity and Inclusion award. After carefully preparing my Spanish in the Community class in the fall with a deliberate focus on the needs of the Spanish-speaking individuals in Storm Lake, I am honored to receive this recognition.

Fourth, my dean nominated me for the New Century Faculty Development Award for Research. I visited Brigham Young University during BVU’s spring break and shared a presentation on two comedias that Albert Camus translated (Calderón’s La devoción de la cruz and Lope’s El caballero de Olmedo). I’ve always been drawn to Camus’s philosophy. When I discovered his interest in the comedia, I knew I had my next research topic. Between that presentation and the project I recently embarked on with Dragoncillo, I suppose my dean felt that either project deserved nomination for this award. I’m grateful for the support.

I’m not certain if I will receive any of these awards. I am tremendously grateful to be nominated in the first place and am excited to hear the results. In the meantime, I’ll keep my fingers crossed.

Summer 2018

Last summer (2018), the American Association of Teachers of Spanish & Portuguese (AATSP) hosted their annual (and centenary) conference in Salamanca. I reached out to a pair of my dear friends and we decided to present a panel on female authority during Spain’s Golden Age. I described alumbradismo, a heretical offshoot of mysticism, and focused on a peculiar case that occurred in the convent of San Plácido (the original home of Velázquez’s Cristo crucificado) known as “el peregrino raro.” Gregorio Marañón spends quite a bit of time discussing it in one of his more substantial 1940 essays, “Don Juan.” Essentially, one of the co-founders of the convent, doña Teresa de Silva—who later became the convent’s abbess—, informed her superiors in 1628 that a type of demonic possession was affecting the nuns at her convent, causing them to enter into fits of “histerismo colectivo.” One instance affected her personally, wherein she felt compelled by “el peregrino raro” to shirk her duties as abbess and spend time in its company. After the Inquisition intervenes, it comes to light that a chronically misbehaving priest, Francisco García Calderón, is to blame for the heretical furor and condemned de vehementi for his misdeeds. My purpose in sharing the events at San Plácido was to underscore the vulnerable position females—particularly religious women—occupied during Golden Age Spain. I introduced the historical precedent that my colleagues rebuffed in their presentations with examples of powerful (and oftentimes fictious) women that autonomously exercised authority during a time when such behavior was severely frowned upon.

My visit to Spain also included some traveling around the northwestern side of the Iberian Peninsula, including a brief stay in Portugal (Porto and Vila do Conde), a short jaunt in Santiago de Compostela, one more road trip through Portugal and back over to Spain, this time cutting eastward to Salamanca, and finally a visit to Madrid for a few days. Having never been to Portugal before, it was a special experience to finally see the eastern side of the Atlantic Ocean. After growing up in California, the seashore felt like it was right where it should be. Santiago de Compostela holds a very special place in my heart, not only for its appeal as a pilgrim destination, but also due to its connection with Ramón del Valle-Inclán, the subject of my doctoral dissertation. Born in Pontevedra, a province just south of the Galician capital, he is one of the place’s most celebrated sons. I took a photograph next to the statue erected in the park where he would overlook the city’s beautiful cathedral. The rest of the trip is a bit of blur: my presentation in Salamanca was followed by an all-too-brief visit to Madrid.

Great mentor, great friend

Try to ignore the horse figurine behind my head. Here’s a picture of me with one of my all-time favorite mentors and a great friend, Dr. Dale Pratt. He and Dr. Valerie Hegstrom visited Southern California last week with Fernando López del Oso, an up-and-coming Spanish science fiction author. Fernando already has a premio minotauro under his belt for his 2009 El templo de la luna and his newest book, Yeti, does not disappoint. While it is always exciting to receive Spanish celebrities, the best part of the visit was seeing Dale and Valerie. Before describing why I admire them as much as I do, I suppose I should provide some of my background.

Back in 2004 (yes, forever ago), I was edging towards graduation as an undergraduate at BYU with a major in Clinical Laboratory Science and a minor in Spanish. The goal at the time was to become a pediatrician and, given that CLS majors did blood, urine, and fecal analysis, you can imagine that anyone holding that degree was pretty much guaranteed a job. After some years as a lab tech, I planned to make the jump to pediatrics.

A year before, in 2003, something pivotal happened: I went to see BYU’s Don Gil de las calzas verdes. The performance was incredible. I was captivated from the beginning when the actors rolled the massive–yet incredibly mobile–stage/cart to an open space beside the library, set up the simple yet meaningful props, and delivered a smashing interpretation of Tirso de Molina’s classic play. After thoroughly enjoying the performance, I determined that I had to participate somehow in the Spanish Golden Age Theater (SGAT) program the following year, regardless of the schedule problems it might present.

When the call for participants in 2004 rolled out, touting the performance of El muerto disimulado, I eagerly attended the first casting meeting. Upon realizing the demand that the play was going to have on my schedule, I rescinded my earlier conviction and became terribly conflicted: I wanted to participate, but could not commit myself to the time and effort required of all participants, especially given how much time I was already putting into my major. I decided that I would have to shelf the SGAT and move on towards becoming a physician. At the time, although difficult, it was the right decision.

Later that year, I went with my retinue of fellow CLS majors to visit a hospital, where the bulk of us would be hired, to observe a typical day of work in the lab. I was excited; it was a chance to catch a glimpse of what I would be dedicating the next few years of my life to. The experience I had at the hospital, however, was far from inspirational. If anything, it proved to be the determining factor that distanced me from Clinical Laboratory Science altogether. While there, I watched as each lab technician, bent over his/her microscope, carefully and silently analyzed their samples. Alone. All by themselves. Not communicating. I even asked some of them how much they interacted with their colleagues, many of which simply shook their heads and laughed. One (disgruntled) lab tech told me, “it’s me, the microscope, and someone’s s%!$.”  Suffice it to say that the visit wasn’t terribly appealing. For me, someone who has discovered that he needs sociability to survive, I had a small mid-of-a-mid life crisis and, after some significant deliberation and prayer, determined that CLS was not my future after all.

This left me at an academic standstill. I was one class (CHEM 352, for what it’s worth) away from completing the equivalent of a “pre-med minor” at BYU and couldn’t fathom taking the course. I knew that I did not want to become a physician. This was not an easy decision. I had been telling people since as long as I could remember that I was going to be a pediatrician. That was just the way that it was going to be. The hospital visit was, in a very real sense, a rude awakening, albeit one that, looking back now, I am very grateful to have had. To make a long story short, I decided to change my major from CLS to Humanities and, realizing that most Hum majors double-majored in another subject, I boosted my minor (Spanish) to a second major. From a CLS major, I went full-bore liberal arts.

While working on my Spanish minor, I took Spanish 339 (intro to Spanish literature) with Dr. Pratt. I remember enjoying the class immensely. It was a pleasure to prepare for and exciting to attend. The lessons were insightful and the books that we read were meaningful to me, a far cry from my chemistry or anatomy textbooks. While the latter texts contained interesting and valuable information, they simply did not resonate with me the same way that Jorge Manrique’s “Coplas por la muerte de su padre,” Ramón Sender’s Réquiem por un campesino español, or Unamuno’s San Manuel Bueno, mártir did. And Dr. Pratt did a marvelous job presenting the texts to a classroom full of literary novices. His voices (if you haven’t heard his don Quijote imitation, you are missing out), his enthusiasm, and his genuine love for literature made the class wonderful. I really feel like that class was foundational for what I’m doing today.

Shortly after dropping CLS, I realized that I would be able to participate in the SGAT program the following year. I sought out the individuals responsible for the program and realized, to my relief, that Dr. Pratt and Dr. Hegstrom were in charge. I scheduled a meeting with Dr. Hegstrom, with whom I was taking Span 441 (Survey Span Lit). This must have been right around the time that I was wandering a little aimlessly. I had just changed my major and really had little to no idea what I was doing, where I would be working, or how I would support a family. I asked Valerie, who patiently listened to me, all of those questions. Looking back, some of my inquiries were a little silly, but at the time they were genuine concerns I had: I asked her if I had what it takes to teach Spanish and if I could raise a family on a Spanish professor’s income. Her answer, which seemed a little unusual at the moment, was to open her door and knock on Dr. Turley’s. I didn’t know Dr. Turley at all at the time, so it was kind of weird. When he opened the door, Valerie asked him, “Jeff, are you able to take care of your family with your income as a Spanish professor?” I think he was a little taken back by the question, but after a little explanation and coaxing, helped me to understand that yes, even Spanish professors can have healthy, happy, and successful families. Odd as it may sound, that moment is unforgettable for me. In a sense, it helped me to understand that what I was doing was ok, that I would make it. At the same time, it helped forge a lasting relationship between Valerie and I that I hold very dear. From that point on, she became a mentor for me.

im000170.jpg

The following year, 2005, my schedule was primed and ready to participate in SGAT. The production, El caballero de Olmedo, was a very ambitious project. As one of Lope’s more popular plays, it had been reworked many times. BYU’s approach unconventionally smashed together a few characters, cut several scenes, and included some novel musical compositions (I never sang, adding to everyone’s relief). I was fortunately selected to play the part of Tello, the play’s gracioso. It was a role that I will never forget. I was learning to act on the fly. I had never done it before, but have always been fairly extroverted, so I didn’t find it too difficult to make a fool of myself (quite literally). That play brought me into touch with some of my dearest friends and colleagues, not the least of which were the two mentors that oversaw the project: Dale Pratt and Valerie Hegstrom.

While Dale and I already knew each other (I was in his 339 class, remember), the relationship was purely teacher-student; we didn’t hang out, eat lunch together, or do any of the things that we’d be happy to do together today. The play changed that relationship. It brought everyone together as a group of actors, scholars, and friends. We all sacrificed enormous amounts of time and effort to make the production as impressive as possible and, from those sacrifices, created lasting relationships.

I participated in SGAT for the next three years of my life (I graduated and started my MA at BYU in 2006), contributing to Las cortes de la muerteEl narciso en su opinión, and El retrato vivo, the works selected for 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. The program provided a needed focus and helped me devote my time and energy to something that I loved doing with people that I loved working with.

After 3 years of working together in SGAT, Dale and I got to know each other very well. We’ve found mutual hobbies (boardgaming being one of the more quirky ones), similar scholastic interests (I’m exploring Ramón del Valle-Inclán–a key member, like Unamuno, of Spain’s so-called generación del 98–‘s repertoire in my dissertation), and have even performed an incredible air-guitar version of Styx’s “Come Sail Away” together (you’ll have to ask Dale to see a copy of that. Or Vanessa. I think she has it somewhere…). All-in-all, both Dale and Valerie have been integral in me getting to where I’m currently at and will undoubtedly play a part in helping me to get to wherever I go in this profession. I appreciate their mentoring, am grateful for their help, and treasure their friendship. Seeing them last week was like a breath of fresh air, a reminder about why I entered this profession, and a great opportunity to be among friends.